OpenAI asks California AG to probe Musk’s ‘anti-competitive behavior’

OpenAI on Monday despatched a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys common, urging them to analyze “improper and anti-competitive habits” by Elon Musk and his associates, as a high-profile trial nears between the 2 sides.

Within the letter, OpenAI technique chief Jason Kwon alleged that Musk has been working to undermine OpenAI by means of varied “assaults” on the corporate, together with by “coordinating his efforts” with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman co-founded the substitute intelligence lab in 2015 as a nonprofit, alongside a number of different researchers and executives. Musk left OpenAI in 2018, after attempting to persuade executives to merge it with Tesla. He later launched a competing firm, xAI, and sued OpenAI in 2024, alleging that he was “assiduously manipulated” and “deceived” after the AI firm explored changing to a for-profit entity. 

Jury choice for the trial is slated to start on April 27, within the Northern District of California.

Kwon mentioned within the letter that Musk’s habits might inhibit OpenAI’s efforts to result in synthetic common intelligence, or AGI, a broad time period for an AI system that rivals or exceeds human intelligence.

“These assaults are designed to take management of the way forward for AGI out of the palms of those that are legally obligated to pursue the mission of making certain that AGI advantages all of humanity, and put it into the palms of rivals who lack mission-driven ideas and spurn any accountability for security,” Kwon wrote.

OpenAI has beforehand expressed associated issues about Musk’s antics.

In January, the corporate despatched a letter to buyers and banking companions warning that it expects Musk to make “intentionally outlandish, attention-grabbing claims” as his lawsuit towards the AI lab heads to trial.

OpenAI mentioned in that letter that Musk will doubtless make feedback in regards to the AI firm that aren’t “grounded in actuality” and are “typical of the harassment techniques he is beforehand deployed.”

Within the letter on Monday, OpenAI referenced a current report from The New Yorker.

That report mentioned Musk and his “intermediaries” had performed intensive opposition analysis on Altman, monitoring his flights and different motion, and that they and different firm rivals circulated this analysis, in addition to false allegations of sexual misconduct, by the OpenAI CEO.

Musk and the manager who runs his household workplace, Jared Birchall, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

OpenAI Chief World Affairs Officer Chris Lehane advised CNBC on Monday that Musk and Zuckerberg are “turning to conduct and approaches that we do assume are actually extremely questionable and sharply worthy of investigation.”

He requested why “two of the highest 4 wealthiest folks, strongest folks on the planet,” try to cease a non-profit from shifting ahead.

OpenAI additionally referenced SpaceX’s IPO within the letter, days after Musk’s rocket firm confidentially filed for what’s prone to be a file providing.

The letter mentioned that if Musk’s authorized efforts are profitable, it’ll profit xAI’s Grok AI platform, which is being investigated globally “for producing sexually express deepfakes of girls, together with kids, with out their information or consent, allegedly to spice up utilization of its companies forward of an upcoming IPO.”

For years, Musk has accused each Delaware and California of bias towards him or his firms, shifting Tesla and SpaceX headquarters from California to Texas, and reincorporating his companies, former Delaware companies, in Nevada and Texas.

XAI can be suing California Legal professional Normal Rob Bonta, alleging that the state’s new AI knowledge transparency regulation violates the corporate’s rights to free speech and to guard commerce secrets and techniques.

— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report.

WATCH: The AI and tech titans weighing up IPOs in 2026